Enter your ZIP to see whether this is legal to plant in your state, and whether it survives your winter.
Form
tree
Mature height
~80 ft
Water need
moderate
Rated in
Global
On this lot
1. Fire evidence and conditions
Fire evidence
Mixed evidence — location does not change the cited classification.
Fire-performance conditions
1 condition stated in cited fire-evidence rows.
Fire ecology context
Placement evidence
Evidence regions
Global
Maintenance
2. Why this plant is relevant here
State distribution
Documented in AL, FL, GA, MS, NC, TX.
Native range
Current cited native range in AL, FL.
Introduced / established
USDA hardiness
Documented minimum 7a; no upper limit is documented.
3. Legal, ecological, and broader status
Legal-list status
Seed-list status
Reported invasive here
Broader regional context
Federal context
How to read this page
The status above is computed from the cited rows below: independent recommendations can support a fire-resistant result, an avoid row can produce keep-away, and disagreement stays visible as conflict. Placement notes preserve each source’s own scheme rather than translating unlike rules into one scale. This is evidence about a plant, not permission to plant it in every part of the defensible space; Zone 0 remains noncombustible.
Native and introduced range evidence
These are exact U.S. botanical-area records from the cited range source. Native and
introduced describe biogeographic relationship, not fire performance or planting approval.
Doubtful and extinct rows stay visible but do not count as current presence.
The lossless worldwide derivative is retained once in the research corpus; object pages repeat only exact U.S. areas needed by the local lens. The JSON twin carries the same page assertions.
Plant hardiness evidence
These values describe the plant source. Your ZIP zone comes from the separate 2023 USDA
Plant Hardiness Zone Map. Whole-zone values stay whole-zone, and a single unresolved value
is not treated as a tolerance range. Different source boundaries stay separate: overlapping
statements are compared independently, while only ranges with no shared zone are called a conflict.
Grouped by what each source concluded. Primary evidence rated the plant itself
(a lab, field program, or original curation); corroboration compiled or
republished another source's rating and resolves to its root lineage.
Listed without a rating (49)Corroboration (49 rows from 1 source)
Primary study Hough1969: Hough, W. A. (1969). Caloric Value of Some Forest Fuels of the Southern United States. Res. Note SE-120. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station.
Shared measurement context: plant part leaves; sampling march.
“calorific value (kcal/kg): 5379”
FLAMITS record 5013.
“calorific value (kcal/kg): 5443”
FLAMITS record 5015.
Shared measurement context: plant part leaves; sampling may.
“calorific value (kcal/kg): 4865”
FLAMITS record 5014.
“calorific value (kcal/kg): 5242”
FLAMITS record 5016.
“calorific value (kcal/kg): 5293”
FLAMITS record 5017; plant part twigs; sampling march.
“calorific value (kcal/kg): 5112”
FLAMITS record 5018; plant part twigs; sampling may.
Primary study McAllister2017: McAllister, S., & Weise, D. (2017). Effects of season on ignition of live wildland fuels using the forced ignition and flame spread test apparatus. Combustion Science and Technology, 189, 231-247.
Shared row context: Ignitability measurement; plant part leaves; fuel live; predrying no; device scale wind tunnel; site McAllister2017-3.
“time to flaming (s): 22.69”
FLAMITS record 9108; sampling may.
“time to flaming (s): 27.51”
FLAMITS record 9109; sampling june.
“time to flaming (s): 29.92”
FLAMITS record 9110; sampling july.
“time to flaming (s): 25.67”
FLAMITS record 9111; sampling august.
“time to flaming (s): 31.03”
FLAMITS record 9112; sampling september.
“time to flaming (s): 28.98”
FLAMITS record 9113; sampling october.
“time to flaming (s): 27.45”
FLAMITS record 9114; sampling november.
“time to flaming (s): 28.03”
FLAMITS record 9115; sampling december.
“time to flaming (s): 31.08”
FLAMITS record 9116; sampling february.
“time to flaming (s): 28.55”
FLAMITS record 9117; sampling march.
“time to flaming (s): 31.31”
FLAMITS record 9118; sampling april.
Primary study Varner2021: Varner, J. M., Kane, J. M., Kreye, J. K., & Shearman, T. M. (2021). Litter Flammability of 50 Southeastern North American Tree Species: Evidence for Mesophication Gradients Across Multiple Ecosystems. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 4, 727042. Primary-study method: freshly fallen litter was oven-dried at 50–60°C for at least 24 hours to constant mass; each trial used a 15 g dry litter fuelbed, with five to seven trials per species.
Shared row context: plant part litter; fuel all; predrying yes; device burning bench; site Varner2021-1; sampling ND.
Primary study Varner2022: Varner, J. M., Shearman, T. M., Kane, J. M., Banwell, E., Jules, E., & Stambaugh, M. (2022). Understanding flammability and bark thickness in the genus Pinus using a phylogenetic approach. Scientific Reports, 12, 7384.