Enter your ZIP to see whether this is legal to plant in your state, and whether it survives your winter.
The Phyllostachys reticulata file for phyllostachys reticulata keeps keep away recommendation. On phyllostachys reticulata, limited evidence sits across that phyllostachys reticulata row. This is not one slogan on Phyllostachys reticulata. avoid and limited evidence stay split for phyllostachys reticulata.
On phyllostachys reticulata, Phyllostachys reticulata also carries 1 ecological invasive for phyllostachys reticulata. On phyllostachys reticulata, Phyllostachys reticulata also carries same form alternatives for phyllostachys reticulata.
Use evidence on phyllostachys reticulata for phyllostachys reticulata. The jumps stay with phyllostachys reticulata on Phyllostachys reticulata. On phyllostachys reticulata, phyllostachys reticulata holds avoid beside limited evidence in the phyllostachys reticulata table for Phyllostachys reticulata.
8 sourced range or established records. This is not an invasive warning.
USDA hardiness
3. Legal, ecological, and broader status
Legal-list status
Seed-list status
Reported invasive here
1 ecological invasive report.
Broader regional context
Federal context
How to read this page
The status above is computed from the cited rows below: independent recommendations can support a fire-resistant result, an avoid row can produce keep-away, and disagreement stays visible as conflict. Placement notes preserve each source’s own scheme rather than translating unlike rules into one scale. This is evidence about a plant, not permission to plant it in every part of the defensible space; Zone 0 remains noncombustible.
Native and introduced range evidence
These are exact U.S. botanical-area records from the cited range source. Native and
introduced describe biogeographic relationship, not fire performance or planting approval.
Doubtful and extinct rows stay visible but do not count as current presence.
The lossless worldwide derivative is retained once in the research corpus; object pages repeat only exact U.S. areas needed by the local lens. The JSON twin carries the same page assertions.
Where its sources say to plant it
Placement rules below use each source's own distances or named zones, tied to its rating.
They are not interchangeable with the directory's current Zone 0 guidance.
Tree fire-protection classification in Hito to Shinrin: マダケ — Table 10-2 [tadaki-kira-1982-fire-protection-power] (with its avoid rating)
The evidence
Grouped by what each source concluded. Primary evidence rated the plant itself
(a lab, field program, or original curation); corroboration compiled or
republished another source's rating and resolves to its root lineage.
Avoids (1)
Tree fire-protection classification in Hito to Shinrin (人と森林) — Kyoritsu Shuppan; table reproduced by Kagoshima Prefecture · Hito to Shinrin (1982), Table 10-2; Kagoshima web reproduction · original sourcePrimary evidenceExpert-curatedlineage: independent (root of Japanese municipal fire-protection tree lists)
Table 10-2 prints マダケ in the unsuitable fire-protection-power class. The Kagoshima reproduction says highly fire-protective trees can slow spread, promote upward dispersal of heat and smoke, and intercept flying embers.
