Enter your ZIP to see whether this is legal to plant in your state, and whether it survives your winter.
The Lophostemon confertus file for lophostemon confertus records Shoot flammability patterns. On lophostemon confertus, 1 ecological invasive reports sits across that confertus row. The facts answer different questions on Lophostemon confertus. Shoot flammability patterns and 1 ecological invasive stay split for lophostemon confertus.
On lophostemon confertus, Lophostemon confertus also carries irrigated test condition for confertus.
Use evidence on lophostemon confertus for confertus. Use test conditions on lophostemon confertus for confertus. The jumps stay with lophostemon confertus on Lophostemon confertus.
Form
tree
Rated in
Central Coast, New South Wales, Australia; Global
On this lot
1. Fire evidence and conditions
Fire evidence
Mixed evidence — location does not change the cited classification.
Fire-performance conditions
1 condition stated in cited fire-evidence rows.
Fire ecology context
Placement evidence
Evidence regions
Central Coast, New South Wales, Australia; Global
Maintenance
2. Why this plant is relevant here
State distribution
Documented in HI.
Native range
Introduced / established
2 sourced range or established records. This is not an invasive warning.
USDA hardiness
3. Legal, ecological, and broader status
Legal-list status
Seed-list status
Reported invasive here
Broader regional context
Federal context
How to read this page
The status above is computed from the cited rows below: independent recommendations can support a fire-resistant result, an avoid row can produce keep-away, and disagreement stays visible as conflict. Placement notes preserve each source’s own scheme rather than translating unlike rules into one scale. This is evidence about a plant, not permission to plant it in every part of the defensible space; Zone 0 remains noncombustible.
Native and introduced range evidence
These are exact U.S. botanical-area records from the cited range source. Native and
introduced describe biogeographic relationship, not fire performance or planting approval.
Doubtful and extinct rows stay visible but do not count as current presence.
The lossless worldwide derivative is retained once in the research corpus; object pages repeat only exact U.S. areas needed by the local lens. The JSON twin carries the same page assertions.
Conditions in the fire evidence
These describe tested or rated plant material. They are not horticultural maintenance instructions.
Grouped by what each source concluded. Primary evidence rated the plant itself
(a lab, field program, or original curation); corroboration compiled or
republished another source's rating and resolves to its root lineage.
4 cited rows from this source; its identity, lineage and tier are stated once.
Primary study Murray2023: Murray, B. R., Hawthorne, T., Curran, T. J., Krix, D. W., Wallace, M. I., Young, K., ... & Webb, J. K. (2023). Shoot flammability patterns among plant species of the wildlandurban interface in the fire-prone Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. International Journal of Wildland Fire, Online early.
Shared row context: plant part branches; fuel all; predrying yes; device grill; site Murray2023-1; sampling ND.
