Current native
0
exact source areas
Home / Plants / Grow / Cotoneaster franchetii
Cotoneaster franchetii
Your local evidence lens
A genus split is not a placement verdict. Set a ZIP to read the local documented split.
The status above is computed from the cited rows below: independent recommendations can support a fire-resistant result, an avoid row can produce keep-away, and disagreement stays visible as conflict. Placement notes preserve each source’s own scheme rather than translating unlike rules into one scale. This is evidence about a plant, not permission to plant it in every part of the defensible space; Zone 0 remains noncombustible.
These are exact U.S. botanical-area records from the cited range source. Native and introduced describe biogeographic relationship, not fire performance or planting approval. Doubtful and extinct rows stay visible but do not count as current presence.
Current native
exact source areas
Current introduced
exact source areas
Qualified
doubtful or extinct source rows
FLAMITS: FLAMmability plant traiTS database
“time to flaming (s): 93.31”
FLAMITS record 3652; Ignitability measurement; plant part litter; fuel all; predrying yes; device epiradiator; site Ganteaume2018-1; sampling summer. Primary study Ganteaume2018: Ganteaume, A. (2018). Does plant flammability differ between leaf and litter bed scale? Role of fuel characteristics and consequences for flammability assessment. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 27, 342-352.
“flaming duration (s): 78.83”
FLAMITS record 3667; Sustainability measurement; plant part litter; fuel all; predrying yes; device epiradiator; site Ganteaume2018-1; sampling summer. Primary study Ganteaume2018: Ganteaume, A. (2018). Does plant flammability differ between leaf and litter bed scale? Role of fuel characteristics and consequences for flammability assessment. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 27, 342-352.
“ignition frequency (%): 38.5”
FLAMITS record 3682; Ignitability measurement; plant part litter; fuel all; predrying yes; device epiradiator; site Ganteaume2018-1; sampling summer. Primary study Ganteaume2018: Ganteaume, A. (2018). Does plant flammability differ between leaf and litter bed scale? Role of fuel characteristics and consequences for flammability assessment. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 27, 342-352.
“flame propagation: 2.78”
FLAMITS record 3697; Combustibility measurement; plant part leaves; fuel all; predrying yes; device epiradiator; site Ganteaume2018-1; sampling summer. Primary study Ganteaume2018: Ganteaume, A. (2018). Does plant flammability differ between leaf and litter bed scale? Role of fuel characteristics and consequences for flammability assessment. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 27, 342-352.
“time to flaming (s): 8.02”
FLAMITS record 3712; Ignitability measurement; plant part leaves; fuel live; predrying no; device epiradiator; site Ganteaume2018-1; sampling summer. Primary study Ganteaume2018: Ganteaume, A. (2018). Does plant flammability differ between leaf and litter bed scale? Role of fuel characteristics and consequences for flammability assessment. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 27, 342-352.
“flaming duration (s): 17.64”
FLAMITS record 3727; Sustainability measurement; plant part leaves; fuel live; predrying no; device epiradiator; site Ganteaume2018-1; sampling summer. Primary study Ganteaume2018: Ganteaume, A. (2018). Does plant flammability differ between leaf and litter bed scale? Role of fuel characteristics and consequences for flammability assessment. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 27, 342-352.
“ignition frequency (%): 50”
FLAMITS record 3742; Ignitability measurement; plant part leaves; fuel live; predrying no; device epiradiator; site Ganteaume2018-1; sampling summer. Primary study Ganteaume2018: Ganteaume, A. (2018). Does plant flammability differ between leaf and litter bed scale? Role of fuel characteristics and consequences for flammability assessment. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 27, 342-352.
“time to flaming (s): 17”
FLAMITS record 13013; Ignitability measurement; plant part branches; fuel live; predrying no; device burning bench; site Terrei2019-1; sampling april to june. Primary study Terrei2019: Terrei, L., Lamorlette, A., & Ganteaume, A. (2019). Modelling the fire propagation from the fuel bed to the lower canopy of ornamental species used in wildlandurban interfaces. International journal of wildland fire, 28, 113-126.
“temperature at flaming (°C): 261”
FLAMITS record 13017; Ignitability measurement; plant part branches; fuel live; predrying no; device burning bench; site Terrei2019-1; sampling april to june. Primary study Terrei2019: Terrei, L., Lamorlette, A., & Ganteaume, A. (2019). Modelling the fire propagation from the fuel bed to the lower canopy of ornamental species used in wildlandurban interfaces. International journal of wildland fire, 28, 113-126.
“flaming duration (s): 44”
FLAMITS record 13021; Sustainability measurement; plant part branches; fuel live; predrying no; device burning bench; site Terrei2019-1; sampling april to june. Primary study Terrei2019: Terrei, L., Lamorlette, A., & Ganteaume, A. (2019). Modelling the fire propagation from the fuel bed to the lower canopy of ornamental species used in wildlandurban interfaces. International journal of wildland fire, 28, 113-126.
“mass loss rate (g/s): 0.08”
FLAMITS record 13025; Combustibility measurement; plant part branches; fuel live; predrying no; device burning bench; site Terrei2019-1; sampling april to june. Primary study Terrei2019: Terrei, L., Lamorlette, A., & Ganteaume, A. (2019). Modelling the fire propagation from the fuel bed to the lower canopy of ornamental species used in wildlandurban interfaces. International journal of wildland fire, 28, 113-126.
“maximum flame temperature (°C): 581”
FLAMITS record 13029; Combustibility measurement; plant part branches; fuel live; predrying no; device burning bench; site Terrei2019-1; sampling april to june. Primary study Terrei2019: Terrei, L., Lamorlette, A., & Ganteaume, A. (2019). Modelling the fire propagation from the fuel bed to the lower canopy of ornamental species used in wildlandurban interfaces. International journal of wildland fire, 28, 113-126.
“rate of burning spread (cm/s): 0.77”
FLAMITS record 13033; Sustainability measurement; plant part branches; fuel live; predrying no; device burning bench; site Terrei2019-1; sampling april to june. Primary study Terrei2019: Terrei, L., Lamorlette, A., & Ganteaume, A. (2019). Modelling the fire propagation from the fuel bed to the lower canopy of ornamental species used in wildlandurban interfaces. International journal of wildland fire, 28, 113-126.