Enter your ZIP to see whether this is legal to plant in your state, and whether it survives your winter.
The Phyllocladus alpinus file for phyllocladus alpinus records keep away recommendation. On phyllocladus alpinus, limited evidence sits versus that phyllocladus alpinus row. The facts answer different questions on Phyllocladus alpinus. avoid and limited evidence stay split for phyllocladus alpinus.
On phyllocladus alpinus, Phyllocladus alpinus also carries A quantitative assessment for phyllocladus alpinus. On phyllocladus alpinus, Phyllocladus alpinus also carries same form alternatives for phyllocladus alpinus.
Use evidence on phyllocladus alpinus for phyllocladus alpinus. The jumps stay with phyllocladus alpinus on Phyllocladus alpinus. On phyllocladus alpinus, phyllocladus alpinus holds avoid beside limited evidence in the phyllocladus alpinus table for Phyllocladus alpinus.
Highly flammable — location does not change the cited classification.
Fire-performance conditions
Fire ecology context
Placement evidence
Evidence regions
Global; New Zealand
Maintenance
2. Why this plant is relevant here
State distribution
Native range
Introduced / established
USDA hardiness
3. Legal, ecological, and broader status
Legal-list status
Seed-list status
Reported invasive here
Broader regional context
Federal context
How to read this page
The status above is computed from the cited rows below: independent recommendations can support a fire-resistant result, an avoid row can produce keep-away, and disagreement stays visible as conflict. Placement notes preserve each source’s own scheme rather than translating unlike rules into one scale. This is evidence about a plant, not permission to plant it in every part of the defensible space; Zone 0 remains noncombustible.
The evidence
Grouped by what each source concluded. Primary evidence rated the plant itself
(a lab, field program, or original curation); corroboration compiled or
republished another source's rating and resolves to its root lineage.
Avoids (1)
Low Flammability Plants directory — Fire and Emergency New Zealand (plant flammability testing at Lincoln University) · 2026 · original sourcePrimary evidenceLab-testedlineage: lincoln-nz-tree
14 cited rows from this source; its identity, lineage and tier are stated once.
Primary study Cui2020a: Cui, X., Paterson, A. M., Wyse, S. V., Alam, M. A., Maurin, K. J. L., Pieper, R., ... Curran, T. J. (2020a). Shoot flammability of vascular plants is phylogenetically conserved and related to habitat fire-proneness and growth form. Nature Plants, 6, 355-359.
Shared row context: plant part branches; fuel all; predrying yes; device grill; site Cui2020a-1; sampling ND.
“ignition frequency (%): 87.5”
FLAMITS record 1452; Ignitability measurement.
“maximum sample temperature (°C): 462.8”
FLAMITS record 1646; Combustibility measurement.
“burning duration (s): 19.3”
FLAMITS record 1840; Sustainability measurement.
“estimated burnt biomass (%): 31.9”
FLAMITS record 2034; Consumability measurement.
Primary study Mason2016: Mason, N. W. H., Frazao, C., Buxton, R. P., & Richardson, S. J. (2016). Fire form and function: evidence for exaptive flammability in the New Zealand flora. Plant Ecology, 217, 645-659.
Shared row context: plant part leaves; fuel live; predrying yes; device muffle furnace; site Mason2016-3; sampling summer.
Primary study Wyse2016: Wyse, S. V., Perry, G. L. W., O'Connell, D. M., Holland, P. S., Wright, M. J., Hosted, C. L., ... Curran, T. J. (2016). A quantitative assessment of shoot flammability for 60 tree and shrub species supports rankings based on expert opinion. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 25, 466-477.
Shared row context: plant part branches; fuel all; predrying yes; device grill; site Wyse2016-1; sampling ND.
