United States / Grow / Northern bayberry

Northern bayberry (Myrica pensylvanica)
Photo: no rights reserved (CC0), via iNaturalist. Species-typical, not necessarily this cultivar.

Northern bayberry

Myrica pensylvanica (accepted: Morella pensylvanica) · Myricaceae · all Myrica records · syn. Myrica pensylvanica · Wikipedia

View Saved

Is this one for your yard?

Enter your ZIP to see whether this is legal to plant in your state, and whether it survives your winter.

Northern bayberry has mixed fire evidence: a low whole-plant laboratory grouping sits alongside adverse combustion findings and planting advice.

Long and colleagues placed northern bayberry in their Low group after controlled whole-plant burns. The study’s classification combined several measurements, including ignition, heat release, flame height and plant consumption. That grouping describes the tested shrubs across those measures.

Dibble, White and Lebow examined unground foliage and twigs in a cone calorimeter. Their material was dried and conditioned before testing, and they named northern bayberry among species with high average effective heat of combustion. This concerns prepared fine fuels. It does not demonstrate that an intact living bayberry ignites more readily than the shrubs in Long’s separate experiment. The studies differ in material burned and result classified.

Regional planting advice also varies. Virginia Firescapes assigns northern bayberry H, or High; Ohio’s bulletin assigns M, or Medium; Michigan includes it in a wildfire-resistant plant list. The publications’ placement systems need their own attribution, too. Virginia prints Zone 3 as 30–100 feet from the house, while Ohio uses 10–30 feet. Treating those zone names as interchangeable would change the instructions.

Michigan’s recommendation carries specific spacing and care conditions. Its bulletin requires a minimum 3 feet between structures and landscape plants, with no organic mulch, peat or wood chips in that barrier. It calls for at least 30 feet between structures and solid stands of wildland vegetation, and 10–16 feet between ornamental plant crowns. At a hill crest, the minimum defensible space on the downhill side is 60 feet. Firewood, propane tanks and other fuels belong outside the applicable perimeter. Plan for mature growth, maintain lawns and remove dead litter; the crown gaps can shrink as plants grow. Its tree-limbing instructions apply to trees, rather than to this shrub.

The historical Eastern U.S. selector rates Myrica pensylvanica Moderately Firewise and marks ladder potential without pruning Yes. It describes a 10-foot multistemmed shrub with high tolerance of poorly drained soils and salt tolerance. Those site attributes leave the ladder concern intact. Its maintenance advice calls for dead and diseased branch removal, clearing dead leaves and twigs, vertical and horizontal separation, and watering and pruning to prevent deadwood accumulation.

A choice needs both parts of the evidence: what each assessment measured or recommended, and the planting conditions attached to that recommendation. The favorable whole-plant grouping cannot supply a universal placement distance for northern bayberry.

Fire-resistant shrubs instead

Form
shrub
Mature height
~10 ft
Light
Part sun
Rated in
Global; Michigan / Great Lakes; Ohio / Midwest; Virginia / Mid-Atlantic +3
On this lot

1. Fire evidence and conditions

Fire evidence
Mixed evidence — location does not change the cited classification.
Fire-performance conditions
1 condition stated in cited fire-evidence rows.
Placement evidence
1 source placement record; source schemes remain separate.
Evidence regions
Global; Michigan / Great Lakes; Ohio / Midwest; Virginia / Mid-Atlantic; eastern US; north-eastern and mid-Atlantic United States; southeastern US
Typed publication scope: 4 scopes across 4 cited fire sources
  • Combustion characteristics of north-eastern USA vegetation tested in the cone calorimeter · Official scoped edition
    • Northeastern and mid-Atlantic study sites (ME, MD, MA, NY, VA footprint); partial normalized coverage · 2007-08-20

      The authors collected foliage and twigs across study sites in Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia, then conditioned and tested the samples in a cone calorimeter. FireApproved publishes 37 exact source owners only as multi-state laboratory context. The source does not establish that every taxon was sampled in every named state, whole-plant behavior, landscape suitability, or state planting guidance.

  • Wildfire-resistant Landscape Plants for Michigan (Extension Bulletin E2948) · Official scoped edition
    • MI; partial normalized coverage · 2007-01-01

      Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E2948 is explicitly a list of wildfire-resistant landscape plants for Michigan and includes a Michigan-native field. FireApproved publishes 221 exact GBIF owners from 226 represented source rows and holds 15 complex or non-exact rows. This dated publication scope is not a current site-suitability determination.

  • Firewise Landscaping (OSU Extension Bulletin 921) · Official scoped edition
    • OH; partial normalized coverage · 2006-03-01

      Ohio State University Extension Bulletin 921 is an Ohio publication that describes Ohio fire seasons and landscape conditions and labels nativity to Ohio. FireApproved publishes 352 exact source-owning plant records from its eight rated tables. This historical publication scope does not assert current extension endorsement or that a listed plant suits every Ohio site.

  • Virginia Firescapes — Firewise Landscaping for Woodland Homes (430-300) · Official scoped edition
    • VA; partial normalized coverage · 2009-04-15

      Virginia Cooperative Extension's publication opens with Virginia wildfire conditions, identifies its Virginia Firewise Landscaping Task Force, and labels plants native to Virginia. FireApproved publishes 306 exact source owners. Publication scope does not establish parcel suitability or current endorsement of this archived 2009 list.

2. Why this plant is relevant here

State distribution
Documented in DC, DE, MD, NJ, OH, PA, WV.
USDA hardiness
Documented range 3–6.

3. Legal, ecological, and broader status

How to read this page

The status above is computed from the cited rows below: independent recommendations can support a fire-resistant result, an avoid row can produce keep-away, and disagreement stays visible as conflict. Placement notes preserve each source’s own scheme rather than translating unlike rules into one scale. This is evidence about a plant, not permission to plant it in every part of the defensible space; Zone 0 remains noncombustible.

Plant hardiness evidence

These values describe the plant source. Your ZIP zone comes from the separate 2023 USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map. Whole-zone values stay whole-zone, and a single unresolved value is not treated as a tolerance range. Different source boundaries stay separate: overlapping statements are compared independently, while only ranges with no shared zone are called a conflict.

Conditions in the fire evidence

These describe tested or rated plant material. They are not horticultural maintenance instructions.

Where its sources say to plant it

Placement rules below use each source's own distances or named zones, tied to its rating. They are not interchangeable with the directory's current Zone 0 guidance.

The evidence

Grouped by what each source concluded. Primary evidence rated the plant itself (a lab, field program, or original curation); corroboration compiled or republished another source's rating and resolves to its root lineage.

Recommends (2)

Avoids (2)

Mid-scale / conditional (2)

Listed without a rating (1)
Corroboration (1 rows from 1 source)
  • FLAMITS: FLAMmability plant traiTS database — Dryad / Global Ecology and Biogeography · Dryad version 9 · original source Corroboration Trait database lineage: meta-aggregator

    “calorific value (kcal/kg): 3749.88”

    FLAMITS record 2877; Combustibility measurement; plant part leaves; fuel live; predrying yes; device calorimeter; site Dibble2007-1; sampling ND. Primary study Dibble2007: Dibble, A. C., White, R. H., & Lebow, P. K. (2007). Combustion characteristics of north-eastern USA vegetation tested in the cone calorimeter: invasive versus non-invasive plants. International journal of wildland fire, 16, 426-443.

Fire-resistant shrubs instead

Fire-resistant shrubs listed above

Last verified 2026-08-23. JSON (CC BY 4.0)

Profiles: USDA PLANTS · GBIF · iNaturalist · Wikidata · Wikipedia · ITIS

Myrica pensylvanica (Northern bayberry). FireApproved. https://fireapproved.com/plants/myrica-pensylvanica/. Last verified 2026-08-23.