Larch
Larix
Your local evidence lens
Separate evidence questions, never one approval badge
A genus split is not a placement verdict. Set a ZIP to read the local documented split.
1. Fire evidence and conditions
- Fire evidence
- Mixed evidence — location does not change the cited classification.
- Fire-performance conditions
- No test or rating condition is normalized.
- Fire ecology context
- No section-reviewed fire-ecology context is normalized.
- Placement evidence
- 1 source placement record; source schemes remain separate.
- Evidence regions
- California; Global
- Maintenance
- No sourced horticultural maintenance assertion is normalized; fire-test conditions do not supply maintenance advice.
Typed publication scope: 1 scope across 1 cited fire source
2. Why this plant is relevant here
- State distribution
- No state distribution is normalized.
- Native range
- No current cited or legacy state native range is normalized.
- Introduced / established
- No introduced or established row is normalized; that does not prove native status.
- USDA hardiness
- No hardiness value is normalized.
3. Legal, ecological, and broader status
- Legal-list status
- Set a location for an exact legal-list result; source silence is not clearance.
- Seed-list status
- Set a location to compare the separate state noxious-weed seed layer.
- Reported invasive here
- No ecological invasive report is normalized; that does not prove noninvasiveness.
- Broader regional context
- Aggregate AK, HI, and L48 evidence is shown only as regional context, never as an exact-state finding.
- Federal context
- Federal designations remain separate from state legal-list results.
How to read this page
The status above is computed from the cited rows below: independent recommendations can support a fire-resistant result, an avoid row can produce keep-away, and disagreement stays visible as conflict. Placement notes preserve each source’s own scheme rather than translating unlike rules into one scale. This is evidence about a plant, not permission to plant it in every part of the defensible space; Zone 0 remains noncombustible.
- Form
- tree
- Region
- China; Japan
- Rated in
- California; Global
- Family
- Pinaceae
- Evidence
- 11 cited sources
Where its sources say to plant it
- Defensible Space Landscaping in the Urban/Wildland Interf…: Chapter 4, Landscape Vegetation Database
The evidence
Avoids (1)
-
“Not recommended by 3 references for use in high fire risk areas.”
1997 Landscape Vegetation Database row: Larix spp. (Larch). Preserved UCFPL transcription marker: U3.
Listed without a rating (10)
-
FLAMITS: FLAMmability plant traiTS database
-
“calorific value (kcal/kg): 2928.25”
FLAMITS record 3606; Combustibility measurement; plant part bark; fuel dead; predrying no; device thermal analyzer; site Gani2007-1; sampling ND. Primary study Gani2007: Gani, A., & Naruse, I. (2007). Effect of cellulose and lignin content on pyrolysis and combustion characteristics for several types of biomass. Renewable energy, 32, 649-661.
-
“time to flaming (s): 1215”
FLAMITS record 19128; Ignitability measurement; plant part wood; fuel dead; predrying yes; device calorimeter; site Hao2020-1; sampling ND. Primary study Hao2020: Hao, H., Chow, C. L., & Lau, D. (2020). Effect of heat flux on combustion of different wood species. Fuel, 278, 118325.
-
“time to flaming (s): 65”
FLAMITS record 19129; Ignitability measurement; plant part wood; fuel dead; predrying yes; device calorimeter; site Hao2020-1; sampling ND. Primary study Hao2020: Hao, H., Chow, C. L., & Lau, D. (2020). Effect of heat flux on combustion of different wood species. Fuel, 278, 118325.
-
“time to flaming (s): 25”
FLAMITS record 19130; Ignitability measurement; plant part wood; fuel dead; predrying yes; device calorimeter; site Hao2020-1; sampling ND. Primary study Hao2020: Hao, H., Chow, C. L., & Lau, D. (2020). Effect of heat flux on combustion of different wood species. Fuel, 278, 118325.
-
“energy flux (kW/m²): 117.4”
FLAMITS record 19137; Combustibility measurement; plant part wood; fuel dead; predrying yes; device calorimeter; site Hao2020-1; sampling ND. Primary study Hao2020: Hao, H., Chow, C. L., & Lau, D. (2020). Effect of heat flux on combustion of different wood species. Fuel, 278, 118325.
-
“energy flux (kW/m²): 127.1”
FLAMITS record 19138; Combustibility measurement; plant part wood; fuel dead; predrying yes; device calorimeter; site Hao2020-1; sampling ND. Primary study Hao2020: Hao, H., Chow, C. L., & Lau, D. (2020). Effect of heat flux on combustion of different wood species. Fuel, 278, 118325.
-
“energy flux (kW/m²): 261.1”
FLAMITS record 19139; Combustibility measurement; plant part wood; fuel dead; predrying yes; device calorimeter; site Hao2020-1; sampling ND. Primary study Hao2020: Hao, H., Chow, C. L., & Lau, D. (2020). Effect of heat flux on combustion of different wood species. Fuel, 278, 118325.
-
“mass loss rate (g/s): 0.02”
FLAMITS record 19146; Combustibility measurement; plant part wood; fuel dead; predrying yes; device calorimeter; site Hao2020-1; sampling ND. Primary study Hao2020: Hao, H., Chow, C. L., & Lau, D. (2020). Effect of heat flux on combustion of different wood species. Fuel, 278, 118325.
-
“mass loss rate (g/s): 0.07”
FLAMITS record 19147; Combustibility measurement; plant part wood; fuel dead; predrying yes; device calorimeter; site Hao2020-1; sampling ND. Primary study Hao2020: Hao, H., Chow, C. L., & Lau, D. (2020). Effect of heat flux on combustion of different wood species. Fuel, 278, 118325.
-
“mass loss rate (g/s): 0.08”
FLAMITS record 19148; Combustibility measurement; plant part wood; fuel dead; predrying yes; device calorimeter; site Hao2020-1; sampling ND. Primary study Hao2020: Hao, H., Chow, C. L., & Lau, D. (2020). Effect of heat flux on combustion of different wood species. Fuel, 278, 118325.
-