Utah
Program and model
Construction sources: reviewed
One local briefing, built from separate evidence layers: what the state has published, where an instrument is documented to apply, what still depends on a map or project fact, and which plant records are documented in Utah. A ZIP personalizes priority; it does not decide a parcel boundary.
What is established here
Utah Code 15A-2-103 adopts IBC, IRC, IPC, IMC, IFGC, NEC, IECC, IEBC, and ISPSC as statewide construction codes. Subsection (2) adopts the 2006 Utah Wildland Urban Interface Code as a construction code that a local compliance agency may adopt by ordinance. That is not a statewide WUI construction mandate. Confirm with the building official.
What is not established
A ZIP in Utah is a postal match, not a parcel, map, or permit. 2 sourced local authorities are open below; 2 have a sourced construction application.
Sourced local authorities (2)
What differs here
Object records that name Utah (not reprinted here):
Guides focused on Utah
2 guides name Utah. The reading list is on Learn.
Plants documented in Utah
432 plant records documented in the state. 0 explicitly document Utah as native range. 115 carry an invasive or noxious flag applying here. 1 fire-evidence sources name Utah in publication scope.
Human page and machine twin
This briefing is the place answer. The claim graph lives on object pages and the JSON twin. Methodology · Utah JSON · place node JSON