Enter your ZIP to see whether this is legal to plant in your state, and whether it survives your winter.
Golden blue-eyed grass has favorable fire-performance listings, but the available sources do not establish it as fire resistant.
The University of California Forest Products Laboratory placed Sisyrinchium californicum among plants recommended by at least three references for use in high-fire-risk areas. The Diablo Firesafe Council likewise lists it among plants receiving favorable ratings from three or more references, citing references 15, 25, and 41. These findings support considering the plant, but they compile recommendations rather than directly measuring how it ignites or burns.
That distinction matters because the Forest Products Laboratory says many underlying lists used undefined terms and often lacked a scientific basis. The Diablo guide also says the ranking terms in its source references were mostly undefined. The two publications therefore should not be mistaken for separate experimental confirmations, especially because the council guide mirrors compiled list material.
Golden blue-eyed grass is an Iridaceae perennial native to the Southwest and Northwest. Its repeated favorable listings are encouraging for homeowners choosing plants for a high-fire-risk landscape, but they do not justify a firm fire-resistant label. The sound conclusion is favorable but unresolved.
Form
perennial
Rated in
California
On this lot
1. Fire evidence and conditions
Fire evidence
Mixed evidence — location does not change the cited classification.
The guide presents itself as fire performance ratings for common landscape plants in a fire-prone California setting. FireApproved publishes 104 exact owners as republished California context. It is not an independent rating, a current endorsement, or parcel suitability.
The UC Forest Products Laboratory says the guide covers properties of common California landscaping plants and was prepared for California fire agencies. FireApproved publishes 130 exact owners at historical California publication scope. The report is a 1997 compilation, not a current endorsement, site rating, or independent test of every row.
2. Why this plant is relevant here
State distribution
Documented in CA, OR, WA.
Native range
Current cited native range in CA, OR, WA.
Introduced / established
USDA hardiness
3. Legal, ecological, and broader status
Legal-list status
Seed-list status
Reported invasive here
Broader regional context
Federal context
How to read this page
The status above is computed from the cited rows below: independent recommendations can support a fire-resistant result, an avoid row can produce keep-away, and disagreement stays visible as conflict. Placement notes preserve each source’s own scheme rather than translating unlike rules into one scale. This is evidence about a plant, not permission to plant it in every part of the defensible space; Zone 0 remains noncombustible.
Native and introduced range evidence
These are exact U.S. botanical-area records from the cited range source. Native and
introduced describe biogeographic relationship, not fire performance or planting approval.
Doubtful and extinct rows stay visible but do not count as current presence.
The lossless worldwide derivative is retained once in the research corpus; object pages repeat only exact U.S. areas needed by the local lens. The JSON twin carries the same page assertions.
Where its sources say to plant it
Placement rules below use each source's own distances or named zones, tied to its rating.
They are not interchangeable with the directory's current Zone 0 guidance.
Defensible Space Landscaping in the Urban/Wildland Interf…: Chapter 4, Landscape Vegetation Database [ucfpl-1997] (with its recommendation)
Fire Performance of Common Plants: Table 1 (favorable in 3 or more references) [diablo-guide-to-plants-three-reference-vote] (with its recommendation)
The evidence
Grouped by what each source concluded. Primary evidence rated the plant itself
(a lab, field program, or original curation); corroboration compiled or
republished another source's rating and resolves to its root lineage.
Fire Performance of Common Plants (Guide to Plants) — Diablo Firesafe Council · live page captured 2026-08-29 · original sourceCorroborationMirrorlineage: ucfpl-berkeley resolves to Defensible Space Landscaping in the Urban/Wildland Interface: A Compilation of Fire Performance Ratings of Residential Landscape Plants
“Table 1: favorable fire performance rating in 3 or more references (refs 15,25,41)”
The Diablo Firesafe Council Guide to Plants lists Sisyrinchium californicum (Yellow-eyed grass) as grass, perennial, in Table 1: plants with a favorable fire performance rating in 3 or more references. The guide cites 3 of its 57 numbered references for this row (15,25,41). The guide states the ranking terms in its underlying references were mostly undefined and makes no attempt to rank within the list, and that fire performance is compromised without maintenance.
