Enter your ZIP to see whether this is legal to plant in your state, and whether it survives your winter.
Acacia glandulicarpa reads on-list in the recommendation evidence. That sourced status is the opening fact for hairy-pod wattle and remains separate from the document that supplies its lineage.
The accepted coverage is limited evidence. Its extent can be audited in the cited rows, without supplying conditions or measurements absent from this species pack.
A resistant-plant publication provides the fire-related source lineage. Its entry remains identifiable in the source table, so the named publication and the on-list recommendation retain their different evidentiary roles.
Form
shrub
Region
Victoria, Australia
Rated in
Victoria, Australia
On this lot
1. Fire evidence and conditions
Fire evidence
Fire-resistant — location does not change the cited classification.
Fire-performance conditions
Fire ecology context
Placement evidence
Evidence regions
Victoria, Australia
Maintenance
2. Why this plant is relevant here
State distribution
Native range
Introduced / established
USDA hardiness
3. Legal, ecological, and broader status
Legal-list status
Seed-list status
Reported invasive here
Broader regional context
Federal context
How to read this page
The status above is computed from the cited rows below: independent recommendations can support a fire-resistant result, an avoid row can produce keep-away, and disagreement stays visible as conflict. Placement notes preserve each source’s own scheme rather than translating unlike rules into one scale. This is evidence about a plant, not permission to plant it in every part of the defensible space; Zone 0 remains noncombustible.
The evidence
Grouped by what each source concluded. Primary evidence rated the plant itself
(a lab, field program, or original curation); corroboration compiled or
republished another source's rating and resolves to its root lineage.
