{"id":"schinopsis-lorentzii","license":"CC-BY-4.0","data":{"scientificName":"Schinopsis lorentzii","commonNames":["Schinopsis lorentzii"],"taxonRank":"species","acceptedName":"Schinopsis lorentzii","family":"Anacardiaceae","ids":{"usdaSymbol":"SCQU5","gbifKey":3190531},"regions":["Argentina"],"plantForm":"tree","evidence":[{"source":"flamits","verdict":"not-rated","verdictRaw":"flammability index: 0.3","score":{"value":0.3,"scale":"FLAMITS — flammability index"},"claims":"FLAMITS record 11906; Integrated measurement; plant part branches; fuel all; predrying yes; device grill; site Santacruz2019-1; sampling ND. Primary study Santacruz2019: Santacruz-García, A. C., Bravo, S., Del Corro, F., & Ojeda, F. (2019). A comparative assessment of plant flammability through a functional approach: The case of woody species from Argentine Chaco region. Austral Ecology, 44, 1416-1429.","plantPart":"shoot","original":"Santacruz2019","edition":"Dryad version 9","url":"https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.h18931zr3","documentDate":"2023-12-22T00:00:00.000Z","accessedOn":"2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z"}],"flammabilityClass":"mixed-evidence","ratingReason":"limited-evidence","recommendation":"candidate","author":"grayson-graham","reviewStatus":"draft","lastVerified":"2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z","reviewNotes":"FLAMITS measurements are retained as non-voting evidence; the database publishes no cross-variable directional threshold."},"localAssessmentInputs":{"stateDistribution":[],"nativeStates":[],"rangeAssertions":[],"usdaZoneMin":null,"usdaZoneMax":null,"hardinessAssertions":[],"hardinessSelection":{"status":"none","assertions":[]},"invasiveIn":[],"statusAssertions":[],"fireEvidenceClass":"mixed-evidence","recommendation":"candidate","fireSourceScopes":[],"firePerformanceConditions":[],"maintenanceAssertions":[],"maintenanceConditions":null,"regulatoryReviews":{},"seedReviews":{}},"legacyCompatibilityProjection":{"nativeStates":[],"invasiveIn":[]},"localAssessmentContract":"Compare each dimension separately. State noxious-weed seed designations are material-scoped and never become non-seed plant restrictions, ecological-invasive findings, nursery restrictions, alternatives, product evidence, or fire votes. Introduced/established context is not an invasive warning. Minimum-only hardiness has no inferred maximum; canonical source-temperature conversion is validated and contradictory applicable rows project no primary zone. L48 context applies only to conterminous states and is never exact-state status. Fire-performance conditions are not maintenance advice. FEIS fire-ecology context does not vote in the plant classification. Absence of a status row is not regulatory clearance."}