{"id":"cmp-007","license":"CC-BY-4.0","data":{"title":"Deck board menu: 2x lumber exception vs composite vs FRT (with test tags)","file":"/diagrams/cmp-007-deck-board-route-menu.svg","caption":"FA Exhibit CMP-007. Deck-board route menu.","alt":"A comparison of the Oregon R327 nominal two-inch lumber exception, a documentation-dependent composite product route, and exterior fire-retardant-treated wood, all within the greater-than-30-inch and less-than-12-foot walking-surface scope.","kind":"diagram","rights":"cc-by-4.0","depicts":"This sheet prevents three different deck-board arguments from collapsing into material nicknames","identifiableAddress":false,"exifGpsStripped":true,"derivation":"2023 ORSC R327.3.5 / .3.5.1 + FEMA P-737 §4.8 / TABLE 10 · ORIGINAL FA COMPARISON.","technicalReviewer":"Grayson Graham","lastVerified":"2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z"}}